![]() |
Quote:
I think you are right! And the funny thing in my mind is that the lack of forethought and planning isn't good for business. So someone f'd up! |
:2cents:
Well... :rant: The big oil company owners spend big money to lobby congressional change. Bigger money=quicker change and more advantageous legislation. Since the big bucks influence law it is reasonable to get laws enacted that would save the big bucks first as disasters come along. Voila! Insurance bailouts. The oil companies don't want to self insure, they want big insurers to carry them. The insurance underwriters know which way the oil flows and puts the money where the profits are. Lawmakers can now nationalize insurers as insurers runs the oil companies. Oil companies and insurance companies buy advantages in laws and PRESTO-CHANGO Uncle Sam now is the proud father of foundering oil companies. The bosses of those oil companies pull out with massive profits and are forever rich while we are strapped with the tax burden and an oil company that we are tied to like brown on shit! :cboy: |
Quote:
Once again, you have taken to inserting words into someone else's mouth. All because I spoiled your fun by not taking the bait, & engaging in a link-posting battle. As I said, I can post figures proving I'm right, & you could post just as many to prove me wrong. Numbers, facts, figures can all be manipulated & massaged to suit the circumstances. All I know for sure is, I can't remember the last time I heard of an oil co. having to go into Chapter 11, or even having financial difficulties. I stated in another thread that I don't suffer from high blood pressure...mostly that happens because I try to stay out of pointless point-of-view debates. Get a life. I don't need this. |
Quote:
Actually, I doubbt that you can. Good Luck |
scotziodman,
Here are links to 4 Oil companies which have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_...Oil-Co-Inc.html http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpa...5C0A9679582 60 http://findarticles.com/p/articles/...26/ai_n15629988 http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/11919660?f=most_read |
Quote:
wyndhy, Perhaps if we increased the involvement of government in the lives of the citizens, it could fix all those problems. |
*ignore*
oh! You can't put a whole thread on ignore. My bad :p |
Did you want to ignore the thread when you were trying to make your point? :rofl:
|
:truce: :truce: :truce: :truce: :truce: :truce: :truce: :truce: :truce:
|
Quote:
No, I was stating my point of view not trying to force anyone to agree with it or to change their views. It was when you once again obviously still suffering from a case of self importance, began challenging other's views that it caused another good conversation to go south. Thanks again. If there was a gold medal for obnoxious you'd be a freakin' champ. Really. |
Quote:
less "involvement" would suit me better. |
Lord Snow,
I believe that Murfreesboro ran out of gas due to the combination of the interruption of supplies by Hurricane Ike, and the panic buying created by the rumor of shortages and/or large price increases. TingligTess, scotzoidman, and Lilith were discussing the shortage/price issue in the $$Gas$$ thread on the 12th & 13th. Lilith posted that her town also had problems almost as bad as yours. As was commented on in that thread, some people jump to conclusions, and others join in without thinking. It is an unfortunate fact of life. Has Murfreesboro been resupplied yet? |
Yeah, we got some. I went to the pumps today and they had nothing but the 87 octane in most of them. No mid or premium.
|
Quote:
Merely cut and paste the individual quotes and on/off html commands individually. Quote:
Actually this, would be second-hand, but tha's a very minor quibble. Not anywhere near as important as: Quote:
Yeah, yeah, Ive heard this all before. "I/my father/my friend/my cultural hero, worked his/her/their assess off, and never exploited anyone", blah, blah, blah. Hey, if that response seems dismissive, it's because it is. The problem with this line of argument is that it totally ignores the vast majority of people who did exactly the same amount of work, worked exactly as hard as whomeever you're aggrandizing, and yet ended up with nothing to show for it. The line of argument you're pursuing, (and I am attacking the argument, not you personally), is not much more than a continuance of the "blame the victim" mentality. The social paradigm is that "In America, anyone can succeed. Therefore, if you don't succeed, there*must* be soemthing wrong with you." ...as opposed to the idea that we have something wrong with a system that encourages people to do whatever it takes (and "whatever" means "whatever": there can be found numerous examples of people who do succeed in socially acceptable ways that aren't as nasty as other, equally socially acceptable ways) to succeed. Indeed, "success" under this system is largely defined as being "better" than the majority of people, in whatever aspect you, the individual choose to emphasize. |
Bonjour Jacques – toujours :rolleyes:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.