I'll take Poe references at sex sites for $1000, Alex. :p

Wouldn't that be "Switch & Masturbate" WI?

mastur = ' :p

Is that what ' is I've seen it all around and wondered so how dose it work can"mastur"t, don"mastur"t, won"mastur"t, and I"mastur"ve or at the end of words like doin"mastur", thinkin"mastur" talkin"mastur" and livin"mastur".

My English teacher would be so proud if she could see me now. :D

a lot of things were done in the old testament that Jesus condemned in the new.
you can pick out many things in the old testament and justify it today, they were not against the law then until Jesus did away with it in the new.
Listen I dont want to get into a Bible argument with anyone okay, God has clearly given us all FREE WILL; but , their is a consequence of it. Good or bad, right or wrong it is OUR choice.
Oral sex is still sex and it can kill you obviously.
Syphilis in lungs is the STD.
Screw some acts of preachers, priest and holy men in all religions and faiths just cause they may do it does not make them RIGHT, it makes them HUMAN.

Is monogomy the BEST choice,
or is anything you want the BEST choice?

Choose just my opinion, I'm done.

These are discussion boards, marval. That implies discussion of your posts.

Syphilis can be treated - with frequent STD testing there is no reason why it . Why aren't you worrying about HIV? It is transmissible by oral sex, and there is no cure.



Without premarital sex and adultery, STDs would still exist : most of these are not transmissible only by sexual contact.

And what good can repressing sexual orientation do?

Kinsey found that there were an awful lot of 'God's will' abiding married Catholics who had enormous problems with sex, since the sense that "sex is bad" was drummed into them so strongly they were unable to perform normally sexually.

A woman who knows NOTHING of sex or her own sexuality until her wedding night is unlikely to find it an enjoyable experience and her equally ignorant husband will find it difficult to give her an experience that will change her perseption. She'll end up 'tolerating' sex for the sake of fulfilling her 'wifely' duties and we end up in a situation where sex within the marriage bed is tantamount to rape - who knows, sexual frustration for the husband due to lack of proper emotional fulfillment from sex with an unresponsive partner could even lead to sexual abuse within a family or homosexual tendancies as a way of finding physical relief.

At the end of the day, we cannot 'switch-off' our sexuality just as we can't 'switch off' our need to eat. What we can do, is recognise that and be more open to discussion of our physical needs within our relationships, so that we do not have to lie and cheat on a partner who trusts us.

Funny, that argument has a very familiar ring to it...oh, yeh, I remember now, it was the same line my mama pulled out every time I pointed out the glaring contradictions in the Bible...so, if the old law is out, & we only go with what Jesus said as true, why do we still keep the Old Testament around?.
You brought it up, cuzzin....

I never meant to say that they were right...my point is that the Bible is a flawed document, (did he really say that!?! :eek: ) written by flawed humans, edited by same, & has been used & abused by the worst scoundrels to justify the worst impulses of human nature...to the point that your statement, "we all know what God says" cannot be true, because so many that THINK they know what it says are just vomiting up the corrupted interpretations of some demogogue...

Scotz

"It just occurred to me, you don't suppose there's a cask of Amontillado down in that cupboard?"

There was untill one dinner just before PAGAN06, when some bastard Aussies ran out of plonk.

The Bible is a translated collection of translations of translations of documents of Jewish religious, social and cultural lore and history. Whether it is the written essence of the Spirit or a more mundane but still relevant (for some) document is a matter of faith and as such is open to discussion, not debate.

That depends on what you mean by the word "is". :p

Enough to have used it 4 times.

It was Noah's daughter's; not Lot's.

By the way, the whole Lot/incest thing. He didn't commit incest. He offered his daughters to the townsmen because they wanted to have their way with a male visitor of Lot's who just happened to be an angel. I know, call me a Bible scholar.

Just because Lot made a very, very bad mistake, that still doesn't mean he wasn't righteous. Thankfully, I'm not profoundly classified as good or bad based on one or more of the epic mistakes I've made in my life.

By the way again, cheating on my wife, thankfully, is not one of those epic mistakes. But goodness knows the temptation has been there.

Gen. 19:31-38 :confused:

You're right, WildIrish! Sorry for getting my stories confused...


Wish there was a "foot-in-mouth" icon.