Pigeon Hole Principle
 

Pigeon Hole Principle states a woman can't have more than three boyfriends at a time.

Of course, it amazes me that it took mankind until 1834 to discover the obvious.

Well of course there are some not so obvious implications like right now there is someone out there with the exact same number of hairs on their head.

Or if you had 10 black socks and 12 red socks you only need to draw three socks at random without putting them back in to get a matching pair.

Or that if one considers an n-dimensional hypercube, and connect each pair of vertices to obtain a complete graph on 2n vertices. Then colour each of the edges of this graph using only the colours red and black. What is the smallest value of n for which every possible such colouring must necessarily contain a single-coloured complete sub-graph with 4 vertices that lies in a plane? It would possibly take a number so large that there is simply not enough matter in the universe to create the ink to write it.

But as far as anyone here should be concerned, if you are going to have an orgy the maximum ratio of guys to girls should be 3:1 unless you are expecting some male on male homosexuality.

So I imagined the party in 2005 when I entertained 6 men...
(it's called a gangbang)
I do understand what you are saying, it's just that the formula ignores...
well, "serial" events. It concentrates on how many men can penetrate one woman in a given instant. (oral anal vaginal). But ignores simple things like performing two blowjobs at once by alternating between two men.
Or a line of men (YUMM!) standing in line... and I can't believe I am writing this.

WW

I believe that Wanda's "Pleasure Principle" carries far more validity than the Pigeon Hole Principle......... I'd really have to do some in depth research on the topic though. Oh for a grant to study at WWU. :wish:

Yep to graduate with Suma Cum Loud honors from that program would indeed be the dream of a lifetime. :p


*as you can tell by the above spelling, I've never graduated with honors* :rofl:

Yep, this is somewhat limiting I feel. What about hand jobs, footjobs, tit-fucks etc? I'm sure, if pressed, even I could manage more than three. ;)

since it's the pigeonhole theory, then it's scientifically sound - but then, science can be so cold and inhibitive. :D

Well who wouldn't expect some? :D

All I can say is I like the way these ladies think.

Hmm One woman and 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... men ? Now if I were one of the men and my wanting ass all lubed and primed for for fucking was getting fucked as it should be, then the whole thing works nicely! Particularly if I can suck a load at the same time.:69:

the pigeon's hole princilple, however, states that the maximum ratio of pigeons to men is 1:1, as the size of and distance between holes is ill proportioned to inserted object; inserted object obliterates any possible use of nearby holes in a ratio of 1:3

At a time means at the same time, sorry.

There is no limit on the number of heterosexual men she can fuck over a given period of time.



It's the pidgeon hole principle and hands, tits, feet are not holes but actually a saddle.

Plus, one guy each in the vagina, mouth, anus, each hand, each foot, and between the breasts would be way too complicated and take too much work. I mean I've watched enough gangbang porn (for research on this), and I've never seen this happen.



Well I didn't expect it either. I mean what happened to ladies first? Penises are for the ladies first.



Well now things are getting complicated. But I think that if you have only one woman, you can still have as many guys you would like if you don't mind the man on man action. Let me get out my tinker toys and do some experimenting. For the purposes of this model each man can only have two partners. Someone on his penis and someone in his mouth or using his one toungue.

Let's all see if e can get a good enough orgy going here to simulate the structural bonds in our favorite organic molecules.

I present the following as evidence...



The woman in the upper right corner could very well be entertaining a fourth gentleman.

Try me!

Yes, but there is two penises in one hole there.

One penis to a hole that was the condition.

Apparently she's busy...any port in a storm. :p

I don't see any condition regarding only one penis per hole. I do see the statement 'adding another object will force you to reuse one of the holes' which to me supports the argument that if capable, a woman can enjoy the pleasures of additional men beyond three.

Thank goodness! :D