View Single Post
  #20  
Old 05-03-2003, 04:14 PM
IceLore's Avatar
IceLore IceLore is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 25
Send a message via ICQ to IceLore Send a message via AIM to IceLore Send a message via Yahoo to IceLore
I've had both, and would prefer cut. Uncut guys have it a bit better due to the fact (I think) they are easier to jack off, and I really believe that having a foreskin keeps the lil fella a bit more sensitive. To counter the sensitivity thing, my cut man, now DON'T LAUGH, wears a little hood over his wanker. Like a mini excutioners hood. Kind of cute on a creepy way... Anway, I have had some skanky encounters with natural guys that have turned me off. If I unroll the foreskin and there is toe jam and belly button lint in there...ther is a major problem! But there is something about a cut guy that turns me on. I love guys with a pronounced head cause it makes shuch a lovely ridge...and the site of an erect, cut member, with satiny skin all nice and smooth.....oh, well, I guess I'mm getting carried away here. heehee Um, yeah, I'm gonna go now. Got some stuff to do... :::blush:::
__________________
Are you gonna go quietly, or are we gonna wake the neighbors?
Reply With Quote