10-30-2003, 10:38 AM
|
 |
1 of 8,111,103,258
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: 41.36N-81.32W
Posts: 21,489
|
|
That is the issue from MY prospective.
Quote:
Thank you for providing an example of the point I was making. Comments of this nature are often called "ad hominem", being directed against one's opponent, rather than remaining focused on the issues. They add little or nothing to the debate.
This particular one includes a common mistake: ......
|
I guess I provided more examples of what this is about than I was aware of at the time. And I did make a terrible PC error in using “he” in my query as to whether the specie, not an individual, is capable of addressing valid matters concerning it’s well-being and development, as opposed to it’s obsessions with internal conflict.
I apologize to jseal for my fauxpas and thank him for validating my premise of hupeopleities inability to look beyond itself.
(gosh, I hope that’s the proper new word )
__________________
 PANTIES
the best thing next to cuchie
"If God didn't want you to play with it, He would have put it between your shoulder blades,..... not at the end of your arm"
Except for speculation, we ONLY have NOW and EACHOTHER!
real world of cyber people ~ Pixies ~ real people of the cyber world
|