
09-05-2007, 07:00 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 22,127
|
|
so what's your opinion
guy shoots cop, serves time for attempted murder
cop dies 41 years later, same guy charged with murder
thoughts?
__________________
If someone offers a penny for your thoughts and you put your two cents in, what happens to the other penny??
Don’t let the hardship of the past, take away from the joy of the present
|

09-05-2007, 07:15 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,687
|
|
Harsh.
I see where this is coming from, but if a car is stolen, rebirthed, sold, then accidently runs over someone, is that homcide by the car thief?
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|

09-05-2007, 07:20 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
41 years later? Excessive. Nope.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|

09-05-2007, 07:23 AM
|
 |
arOusal art!st!
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Down the road
Posts: 9,268
|
|
I think someone's still bitter. Understandably so, but the shooter did serve his time.
__________________
Variety is the soul of pleasure. ~ Aphra Behn
|

09-05-2007, 07:49 AM
|
 |
pixie of the wood
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,575
|
|
well, it ain't scottish.
comes too close to double jeopardy, they're just creating loopholes.
|

09-05-2007, 07:54 AM
|
 |
Mrs FussyPucker
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 3,635
|
|
I'm sure I heard somewhere that in Britain there's a law where if you die of your injuries up to one year after being attacked or whatever, then the perp can be tried for murder, but if you die of your injuries even a year and one day afterwards then it can only be attempted murder.
I'm not sure if that's right exactly - perhaps I dreamt it, but it would make sense that there's some time scale involved surely?
But if we're going down that road, how about every rapist whose victim eventually commits suicide or becomes a substance abuser and dies from that? Shouldn't they be charged with murder too?
__________________
"Time flies like an arrow -
Fruit flies like a banana"
M Y - N A U G H T Y - P I C T U R E S ! !
|

09-05-2007, 07:57 AM
|
 |
Mrs FussyPucker
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 3,635
|
|
Just to stir the pot a bit?
Would people have different views if the guy had been in a coma for 41 years? Would that make a difference?
__________________
"Time flies like an arrow -
Fruit flies like a banana"
M Y - N A U G H T Y - P I C T U R E S ! !
|

09-05-2007, 10:40 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: midwest
Posts: 637
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loulabelle
I'm sure I heard somewhere that in Britain there's a law where if you die of your injuries up to one year after being attacked or whatever, then the perp can be tried for murder, but if you die of your injuries even a year and one day afterwards then it can only be attempted murder.
I'm not sure if that's right exactly - perhaps I dreamt it, but it would make sense that there's some time scale involved surely?
But if we're going down that road, how about every rapist whose victim eventually commits suicide or becomes a substance abuser and dies from that? Shouldn't they be charged with murder too?
|
You're probably thinking of the " Year and a Day Rule". That law was abolished in the UK in 1996.
|

09-05-2007, 10:37 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: midwest
Posts: 637
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyndhy
well, it ain't scottish.
comes too close to double jeopardy, they're just creating loopholes.
|
Where's double jeopardy? Last time I checked murder and assault were two separate crimes.
|

09-06-2007, 02:19 AM
|
 |
Booger Lama
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,552
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jude30
Where's double jeopardy? Last time I checked murder and assault were two separate crimes.
|
He wasn't charged with Assault he was charged with attempted murder. I'll agree that attempted murder and murder are not the same crime as far as the law is concerned. The difference is if the victim dies or not. In this case the victim did not die and he was charged with attempted murder because of that. He was convited and has sevred his time now the want to charge him again with murder for the same act because the victim has died. The fact that he is being charged with a new crime for the same act is what makes it double jeopardy.
__________________
it's only kinky the first time
it's not the orgasm but getting there thats fun
a shot in the bush is worth two in the hand
whip me, beat me, tie me up, break my arm, but please don't break my heart
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid people are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt" -Bertrand Russell
|

09-06-2007, 08:39 AM
|
 |
Turn it up!
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jude30
Where's double jeopardy? Last time I checked murder and assault were two separate crimes.
|
He served time for attempted murder, not assault.
__________________
Plug me into somethin'
If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.
No good deed ever goes unpunished
Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
|

09-23-2007, 10:00 AM
|
On a endless Vision Quest
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: .
Posts: 284
|
|
Homicidal Tendencies
Quote:
Originally Posted by musicman
guy shoots cop, serves time for attempted murder
cop dies 41 years later, same guy charged with murder
thoughts?
|
 Murder: The killing of a human being by a sane person,with intent,malice aforethought(prior intention to kill the particular victim or anyone who gets in the way),and with no legal excuse or authority.This is "First Degree Murder".By statute inclusion the death of a Police Officer, or Prison Guard,with OR without premeditation and with Malice presumed is also First Degree Murder. Second Degree Murder,is such a killing without premeditation,as in the heat of passion or in a sudden quarrel or fight.To be Murder the victim must die within a year of the attack. Attempted Murder is commited when the defendant does an act that is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the crime of Murder and,at the time of these acts,the person has specific intention to Kill. Criminal Attempted Murder depends on an intention to Kill alone. Attempted Murder is only the planning of a Murder,NOT the actual Killing,which is the Murder. Criminal Attempts carries a Maximum penalty of LIFE Imprisonment,(the same as that for a successful Murder). So, in answer to your question,the defendant,having served his sentence,on the original charge,and as clearly the limit of time exceeded,(one year,to be considered a Murder charge) The defendant was wrongfully prosecuted,as he did not fall within the scope of Murder...Personaly,I say,"Kill em' all, let god sort it out", and "3 people can keep a secret, if 2 of them are Dead".lol,take care of each other, Crazeee,,,, 
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.
|